Editorial policy

Bright World Review aims to describe the sky carefully and make its explanations easy to follow. We distinguish observation from interpretation, check factual claims before publication and make corrections when we find an error.

Accuracy and clarity

Writers should use reliable, relevant sources for claims that need support and take care with dates, terminology and scope. We avoid presenting a personal observation as a universal rule. When an explanation is uncertain or simplified for a general reader, the wording should make that clear.

Independence and interests

Editorial decisions belong to Bright World Review. A partnership or commercial relationship does not guarantee coverage or a favourable account. Any material relationship relevant to a piece will be disclosed alongside that material so readers can understand its context.

Corrections

Readers can use the Contact page to point out a possible mistake. We review correction requests, amend confirmed errors and make significant changes clear in the affected material rather than quietly leaving readers with an inaccurate account.

Partner material and illustrations

Paid or partner-supported material is identified clearly and kept distinct from independent editorial coverage. Some illustrations may be generated with AI; where that is the case, the illustration is labelled, and it is not presented as a documentary photograph of a real sky.